8 international building code approaches that should be adopted more widely

As an architect, I was always taught to experience a space as a user before starting the design process. This ensures that every small detail can be visualised and addressed.

Speaking of international standards, I believe ISO 21542 should be widely adopted. This code ensures that buildings are designed to be accessible and usable by people with diverse physical and sensory abilities. When you imagine yourself in their place, you quickly realise how many current designs remain exclusive.

Inclusive spaces should be accessible without relying solely on stairs; ramps should be integrated seamlessly, hallways should be wider, and restrooms must be fully accessible. Furthermore, the use of tactile pathways, Braille elevator buttons, and both audio and visual alarms are necessities, not luxuries.

I have realised that when we design according to these regulations, a building becomes "universally friendly" for all age groups and ability levels. More importantly, it significantly improves building safety and inclusivity. Such a design remains functional for a diverse population throughout the entire lifecycle of the structure.

What is one international building code approach that you believe should be adopted more widely?

One approach that deserves broader adoption is the stronger emphasis many international building codes place on moisture management and ventilation inside wall systems and living spaces. In several countries, construction standards require more deliberate ventilation pathways and moisture barriers within walls, flooring systems, and roofing assemblies. These codes recognize that moisture is one of the most common causes of structural deterioration and indoor air quality problems. By designing buildings to manage humidity and airflow properly, these systems help prevent mold growth, structural rot, and premature material failure.

How would this specific regulation improve building safety or sustainability?

Better moisture and ventilation standards improve both the safety and lifespan of a building. When moisture is properly controlled, materials such as flooring, cabinetry, drywall, and framing maintain their structural integrity for much longer periods of time. From a sustainability perspective, this reduces the need for frequent repairs and material replacement, which ultimately lowers long term resource consumption. In practical terms, it also creates healthier indoor environments for occupants because improved ventilation reduces trapped humidity and airborne contaminants. A building that manages moisture effectively tends to perform better over decades rather than just the first few years after construction.

One international building code approach that deserves wider adoption is the requirement for continuous exterior insulation in building envelopes, a standard commonly used in parts of Europe and Canada. Instead of relying only on insulation placed between wall studs, this method adds a consistent layer of insulation across the entire exterior surface of a building. That extra layer helps eliminate thermal bridging, which happens when heat escapes through structural materials like wood or steel framing. Thermal bridging may seem like a small technical issue, yet it can significantly reduce the energy efficiency of a building and create cold spots that lead to condensation or moisture problems inside walls.

When continuous insulation becomes part of building code requirements, the impact reaches beyond energy savings. Buildings maintain more stable indoor temperatures, heating and cooling systems operate more efficiently, and long term structural durability improves because moisture control becomes more reliable. Renovation and construction teams often see how small design changes can create lasting benefits. Companies like Accurate Homes and Commercial Services frequently evaluate insulation performance when upgrading older properties, especially in commercial renovations where energy efficiency affects operating costs year after year. A code standard that encourages continuous insulation would push more builders to adopt practices that protect building performance while reducing long term energy consumption for property owners.

One international building code approach I believe should be adopted more widely is the "airtightness testing" requirement used in places like the UK and parts of Europe. In simple terms, it mandates a blower door test to measure how much air leaks out of a home before final approval. I've walked into plenty of remodels where everything looked great on the surface, but you could feel drafts around windows and attic penetrations—those hidden gaps kill energy efficiency and can lead to moisture problems over time.

On one project, we tightened up the building envelope intentionally—sealing seams, improving insulation transitions—and tested it, and the difference in comfort and HVAC performance was immediate. Making airtightness testing standard would push contractors to pay attention to details that usually get overlooked. It improves indoor air quality, reduces energy bills, and prevents long-term structural issues from condensation. It's a small added step that forces higher accountability and delivers a noticeably better-performing home.

If I could import one rule into every building code, it's making whole-home leak detection and an automatic shutoff normal in new builds. In places that treat leak detection as a standard part of plumbing design, a burst hose or failed fitting becomes a phone alert and a closed valve, not a ceiling collapse and mould. It improves safety by cutting slip hazards and electrical risk from flooding, and it improves sustainability because you stop wasting thousands of litres while you're asleep or away. The only downside is cost and maintenance, but compared to one serious water event, it's a smart trade.

One building code approach that deserves wider adoption is the mandatory installation of residual current devices (RCDs) across all residential circuits, not just selected ones.

In Australia, RCD protection has become standard for modern homes because it significantly reduces the risk of electric shock and electrical fires. An RCD can detect current leakage in milliseconds and shut the circuit down before someone is seriously injured.

In older buildings or regions where RCD protection is limited to specific circuits, the risk of electrical accidents remains much higher. Expanding mandatory RCD protection across all circuits would dramatically improve electrical safety in homes, especially where DIY electrical modifications or ageing wiring systems are common.

From a safety standpoint, it is one of the most effective and relatively low-cost upgrades a building can have.

Every day at Mesa Plumbing Heating and Cooling my job is basically to walk around job sites with crews and make sure systems are aligned with codes residential and commercial places. On such occasions, when pipes are being laid inside walls, it is very important to have clear understanding of things. The European method of preventing backflow, called EN 1717, gives exactly that level of clarity. Here risk is not seen as a vague concept but rather is broken down into concrete stages, each level corresponds to a specific corrective action. Therefore decisions regarding installations on-site are not left to mere chance, as the solution pairing makes it clear and more or less expected uniform results in almost every instance. By this approach, the situation is nipped in the bud. Although backflow incidents are a very rare occurrence, occasionally they have the potential to affect entire potable water systems. Whenever a robust regulation exists, the implementation of appropriate protective measures is at the same time. Hence, there is less possibility that contaminated substances will come in contact with fresh ones. The way that buildings are constructed will be very much different. With the increasing complexity of todays configurations for instance recycled water and intelligent pipes - besides just the piping ones, the likelihood of mix up between clean and used ones is also going to increase. However, safety remains intact as the guiding factor behind risks. Functionality that lasts over time and ecological balance go well together with such a mode of operation.

The one approach I'd push for wider adoption is mandatory guardrail and fall protection standards for residential construction — specifically the height-trigger thresholds used in European EN 13374 standards, which are more protective than what most North American codes require for residential decks and balconies.

In our work installing railings and fencing, we see the gap between what's code-compliant and what's actually safe play out regularly. The IBC sets 42-inch guardrail height for commercial applications, but residential decks under certain occupancy types can still be built to 36 inches in many jurisdictions. That six-inch difference matters when a child leans against a rail. Countries that have standardized higher minimums with load-testing requirements across both residential and commercial projects have measurably better outcomes on fall-related injuries.

The specific piece I'd adopt broadly is the requirement for physical load-testing documentation on railings and guardrails post-installation — not just design specifications on a permit. When contractors know the work will be tested and not just inspected visually, the quality of the installation goes up significantly.